Skip to content

Conversation

@jaruesink
Copy link
Contributor

@jaruesink jaruesink commented Nov 26, 2024

Fixes: #7

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Integrated a new controlled RemixTextarea component with validation and submission handling in Storybook.
    • Enhanced the Textarea component for improved form management and error handling with react-hook-form.
    • Updated Calendar component to support custom components and improved prop handling.
    • Improved DatePicker and InputOTPField components for better integration with form handling.
    • Added new story for the RemixTextarea component to demonstrate usage.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected typographical error in README regarding enabling corepack for yarn v4.
  • Chores

    • Removed Slack notification step from the release workflow.
    • Deleted outdated CHANGELOG.md file for @lambdacurry/forms-docs.
    • Updated VSCode settings for default code formatting and actions on save.

@jaruesink jaruesink requested a review from Bfunk54 November 26, 2024 03:55
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes several changes across multiple files. Key modifications involve the removal of a Slack notification step from the GitHub Actions workflow, updates to the README documentation, the deletion of a changelog file, and the introduction of new features in the Storybook integration for a RemixTextarea component. Additionally, significant structural changes were made to several UI components, including Textarea, Calendar, and RadioGroupField, enhancing their integration with form handling libraries and improving error handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yml Removed Slack notification step after successful publish.
README.md Updated Storybook Documentation link and corrected a typographical error.
apps/docs/CHANGELOG.md Deleted file containing versioning information for @lambdacurry/forms-docs.
apps/docs/src/remix/remix-textarea.stories.tsx Added new story for RemixTextarea component with validation and submission handling.
packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx Simplified RemixTextareaProps interface, updated rendering logic to use new components.
packages/components/src/ui/calendar.tsx Updated import for DayPicker to include CustomComponents, modified prop handling for navigation icons.
packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx Changed class name in FormMessage component for semantic styling adjustment.
packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx Updated RadioGroupField to conditionally render error messages based on fieldState.
packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx Expanded TextareaProps interface, refactored Textarea into BaseTextarea and Textarea components for better form integration.
packages/components/src/remix/remix-checkbox.tsx Simplified components object declaration.
packages/components/src/remix/remix-switch.tsx Simplified components object declaration.
packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx Simplified components object declaration.
packages/components/src/ui/checkbox.tsx Updated ref handling for Checkbox component to integrate with react-hook-form.
packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx Updated ref handling for DatePicker component to integrate with react-hook-form.
packages/components/src/ui/input-otp.tsx Updated ref handling for InputOTPField component to integrate with react-hook-form.
packages/components/src/ui/input.tsx Minor formatting change in InputProps interface.
packages/components/src/ui/switch.tsx Updated ref handling for Switch component to integrate with react-hook-form.
packages/components/src/ui/text-field.tsx Updated ref handling for TextField component to integrate with react-hook-form.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant RemixTextarea
    participant FormHandler
    participant Validation
    participant Feedback

    User->>RemixTextarea: Submit form
    RemixTextarea->>FormHandler: Handle submission
    FormHandler->>Validation: Validate input
    Validation-->>FormHandler: Return validation results
    FormHandler->>Feedback: Show success/error message
    Feedback-->>User: Display feedback
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure only necessary attributes are passed to inputs (7) The changes do not explicitly address the issue of unnecessary custom attributes being added to inputs.
Review and merge Storybook implementation for Remix Textarea component (LC-118)

🐰 "In the meadow, changes bloom,
A Slack alert now finds no room.
Textareas dance, forms take flight,
With validation, all feels right.
Documentation shines anew,
A rabbit's cheer for all we do!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/components/src/ui/calendar.tsx (1)

45-47: Consider type-safe props spreading for icon components

While the changes improve type safety with Partial<CustomComponents>, the current props spreading could be more specific.

Consider explicitly typing and spreading only the necessary props:

- IconLeft: ({ ...props }) => <ChevronLeft className="h-4 w-4" {...props} />,
- IconRight: ({ ...props }) => <ChevronRight className="h-4 w-4" {...props} />,
+ IconLeft: ({ className, ...props }: React.ComponentProps<'svg'>) => (
+   <ChevronLeft className={cn("h-4 w-4", className)} {...props} />
+ ),
+ IconRight: ({ className, ...props }: React.ComponentProps<'svg'>) => (
+   <ChevronRight className={cn("h-4 w-4", className)} {...props} />
+ ),

This approach:

  1. Explicitly types the props as SVG element props
  2. Properly handles className merging
  3. Makes it clear what props are expected
packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (1)

70-70: Consider adding null-safe error message access.

To improve type safety, consider using optional chaining for error message access:

-{fieldState.error && <FormMessage Component={components?.FormMessage}>{fieldState.error.message}</FormMessage>}
+{fieldState.error?.message && (
+  <FormMessage Component={components?.FormMessage}>{fieldState.error.message}</FormMessage>
+)}
apps/docs/src/remix/remix-textarea.stories.tsx (5)

12-16: Consider adding a maximum length constraint

While the minimum length validation is good, consider adding a maximum length constraint to prevent potential abuse and ensure reasonable input sizes.

 const formSchema = z.object({
-  description: z.string().min(10, 'Description must be at least 10 characters'),
+  description: z.string()
+    .min(10, 'Description must be at least 10 characters')
+    .max(1000, 'Description must not exceed 1000 characters'),
 });

22-50: Consider showing loading state during form submission

The component handles form state well, but could benefit from showing a loading indicator during submission.

       <fetcher.Form onSubmit={methods.handleSubmit} method="post" action="/">
         <div className="space-y-4 w-[400px]">
           <RemixTextarea
             name="description"
             label="Description"
             description="Enter a description (minimum 10 characters)"
             placeholder="Type your description here..."
           />
-          <Button type="submit" className="w-full">Submit</Button>
+          <Button 
+            type="submit" 
+            className="w-full"
+            disabled={fetcher.state === 'submitting'}
+          >
+            {fetcher.state === 'submitting' ? 'Submitting...' : 'Submit'}
+          </Button>
           {fetcher.data?.message && (
             <p className="text-green-600 text-sm">{fetcher.data.message}</p>
           )}

52-76: Enhance type safety for error responses

Consider defining explicit types for error responses to improve maintainability and type safety.

+type ValidationError = {
+  errors: {
+    description?: {
+      type: string;
+      message: string;
+    };
+  };
+  defaultValues: FormData;
+};
+
+type SuccessResponse = {
+  message: string;
+};
+
-async function handleFormSubmission(request: Request) {
+async function handleFormSubmission(request: Request): Promise<ValidationError | SuccessResponse> {

78-102: Consider enhancing Storybook documentation

The metadata could be improved with additional documentation parameters.

   parameters: {
     layout: 'centered',
     docs: {
       description: {
-        component: 'A textarea component that integrates with Remix Form and provides validation feedback.',
+        component: `
+          A textarea component that integrates with Remix Form and provides validation feedback.
+          
+          ## Features
+          - Integrates with Remix Form
+          - Zod validation
+          - Error handling
+          - Success feedback
+          
+          ## Usage
+          \`\`\`tsx
+          <RemixTextarea
+            name="description"
+            label="Description"
+            description="Helper text"
+          />
+          \`\`\`
+        `,
       },
     },
   },

104-135: Enhance test coverage with additional assertions

While the test scenarios are comprehensive, consider adding more assertions for better coverage.

     // Test validation error
     await userEvent.clear(textarea as HTMLTextAreaElement);
     await userEvent.type(textarea as HTMLTextAreaElement, 'short');
+    expect(textarea).toHaveValue('short');
     await userEvent.click(canvasElement.querySelector('button[type="submit"]') as HTMLButtonElement);
     expect(canvasElement.querySelector('.form-message')).toHaveTextContent(
       'Description must be at least 10 characters'
     );
+    expect(canvasElement.querySelector('button[type="submit"]')).not.toBeDisabled();

     // Test server error
     await userEvent.clear(textarea as HTMLTextAreaElement);
     await userEvent.type(textarea as HTMLTextAreaElement, INVALID_CONTENT);
+    expect(textarea).toHaveValue(INVALID_CONTENT);
     await userEvent.click(canvasElement.querySelector('button[type="submit"]') as HTMLButtonElement);
     expect(canvasElement.querySelector('.form-message')).toHaveTextContent(CONTENT_ERROR);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c301ac and 9f91553.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (0 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • apps/docs/CHANGELOG.md (0 hunks)
  • apps/docs/src/remix/remix-textarea.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/calendar.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • apps/docs/CHANGELOG.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • README.md
  • packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/components/src/ui/calendar.tsx (2)

3-3: LGTM: Type import addition is appropriate

The addition of the CustomComponents type import is correct and follows TypeScript best practices by using type-only imports.


45-47: Verify the impact on existing Calendar implementations

Let's ensure this change doesn't affect existing Calendar usage patterns.

✅ Verification successful

No breaking changes detected in Calendar component usage

The Calendar component is only used internally within the date-picker component, and the changes to the IconLeft and IconRight props are properly typed as Partial<CustomComponents>. The only usage found is in date-picker.tsx where it's used with mode, selected, and onSelect props, which are unaffected by the icon customization changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Calendar component usage to verify compatibility
rg -t tsx -t jsx "Calendar" --glob '!{*.test.*,*.spec.*}' -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Calendar component usage with ripgrep, without file type filtering
rg "Calendar" --glob '!{*.test.*,*.spec.*}' -A 2 -B 2

# Also check for any potential imports of the Calendar component
rg "import.*Calendar" --glob '!{*.test.*,*.spec.*}'

Length of output: 2596

packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (2)

63-63: LGTM! Improved error handling implementation.

The changes enhance the error handling by:

  1. Utilizing React Hook Form's fieldState for validation state
  2. Conditionally rendering error messages only when errors exist

Also applies to: 70-70


63-72: Verify form field integration patterns.

Let's ensure consistent implementation across form field components.

✅ Verification successful

Form field integration pattern is consistent and properly implemented

The implementation follows the same pattern used across all form field components in the codebase:

  • All form components use the same render={({ field, fieldState }) => ...} pattern
  • Error handling is consistent, using fieldState.error with FormMessage
  • The FormMessage component is used uniformly with the same component injection pattern

The radio group implementation matches the established patterns seen in text-field, textarea, checkbox, date-picker, and other form components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent form field implementation patterns across components

# Check for similar form field components and their error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'render={({ field, fieldState }) => {
  $$$
  {fieldState.error$$$}
  $$$
}}'

# Check for FormMessage usage patterns
rg -A 2 "FormMessage.*Component={components\?.FormMessage}" 

Length of output: 316


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify form field patterns

# Check for form field components with error handling
rg -U "render=\{\(\{.*fieldState.*\}\).*=>" --type ts

# Check FormMessage usage with proper escaping
rg "FormMessage.*Component=" --type ts

# Look for other form field components for comparison
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = forwardRef<$_, $_Props>(($_, ref) => {
  $$$
  return (
    <Controller
      $$$
    />
  )
})'

Length of output: 1924

apps/docs/src/remix/remix-textarea.stories.tsx (2)

1-11: LGTM! Well-organized imports

The imports are well-structured and demonstrate good separation of concerns between UI components, form handling, and validation libraries.


18-20: LGTM! Clear test constants

The constants are well-named and effectively support different test scenarios.

packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx (1)

3-5: LGTM!

The import statements and type alias have been appropriately updated to reflect the new components and props.

packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (1)

6-15: Verify that the 'name' attribute is correctly passed to the underlying textarea

By omitting the 'name' attribute from TextareaHTMLAttributes<HTMLTextAreaElement> and redefining it as a required prop in TextareaProps, there's a risk that the name attribute may not be forwarded to the underlying <textarea> element. This could affect form submissions and accessibility.

Please ensure that the name prop is correctly passed down to the <textarea> to maintain expected behavior.

Comment on lines +10 to +15
const components = {
FormControl: RemixFormControl,
FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
};
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Memoize the components object to prevent unnecessary re-renders

Currently, the components object is recreated on every render, which can lead to unnecessary re-renders if the Textarea component relies on referential equality for optimizations. Consider wrapping it in a useMemo hook to ensure the object reference remains stable across renders.

Apply this diff to memoize the components object:

-  const components = {
+  const components = useMemo(() => ({
     FormControl: RemixFormControl,
     FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
     FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
     FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
-  };
+  }), []);

Also, add the import statement at the top of the file:

import { useMemo } from 'react';

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You said this wouldn't add much performance enhancement, so I'm leaving as is.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaruesink, understood. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: jaruesink
PR: lambda-curry/forms#14
File: packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx:10-15
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T05:28:15.991Z
Learning: When reviewing components like `RemixTextarea` in `packages/components/src/remix/`, avoid suggesting to memoize the `components` object with `useMemo` if the performance benefit is minimal.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx (1)

8-21: Consider adding JSDoc documentation

The component would benefit from JSDoc documentation explaining its purpose, usage, and integration with Remix forms. This would help developers understand how to properly use this wrapper component.

Add documentation like this:

+/**
+ * A Remix-compatible textarea component that integrates with remix-hook-form.
+ * Provides form validation and error handling through the Remix form context.
+ *
+ * @example
+ * ```tsx
+ * <RemixTextarea name="description" placeholder="Enter description..." />
+ * ```
+ */
 export function RemixTextarea(props: RemixTextareaProps) {
packages/components/src/remix/remix-switch.tsx (2)

15-23: Consider if memoization is necessary here

The memoization of the components object might be unnecessary in this case because:

  1. The object is static and simple
  2. React's reconciliation is already efficient with simple object literals
  3. The memoization itself has a small performance cost

Consider one of these alternatives:

- const components = useMemo(
-   () => ({
-     FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
-     FormControl: RemixFormControl,
-     FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
-     FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
-   }),
-   []
- );

+ // Option 1: Define it outside the component since it's static
+ const switchComponents = {
+   FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
+   FormControl: RemixFormControl,
+   FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
+   FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
+ };

+ // Option 2: Define it directly in the component if you prefer keeping it scoped
+ const components = {
+   FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
+   FormControl: RemixFormControl,
+   FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
+   FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
+ };

1-1: Consider organizing imports

The imports mix React core, third-party libraries, and local imports.

Consider organizing imports into groups:

- import { useMemo, type ComponentPropsWithoutRef } from 'react';
- import { useRemixFormContext } from 'remix-hook-form'
- import { Switch } from '../ui/switch'
- import { RemixFormControl, RemixFormDescription, RemixFormLabel, RemixFormMessage } from './remix-form';

+ // React core
+ import { type ComponentPropsWithoutRef } from 'react';
+ 
+ // Third-party libraries
+ import { useRemixFormContext } from 'remix-hook-form'
+ 
+ // Local imports
+ import { Switch } from '../ui/switch'
+ import { 
+   RemixFormControl,
+   RemixFormDescription,
+   RemixFormLabel,
+   RemixFormMessage
+ } from './remix-form';
packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (1)

6-15: Add JSDoc documentation for the TextareaProps interface

The generic type parameters and props would benefit from documentation to improve developer experience.

Consider adding documentation like this:

+/**
+ * Props for the Textarea component
+ * @template TFieldValues - The type of the form values
+ * @template TName - The type of the field name
+ */
export interface TextareaProps<
  TFieldValues extends FieldValues = FieldValues,
  TName extends FieldPath<TFieldValues> = FieldPath<TFieldValues>
> extends Omit<TextareaHTMLAttributes<HTMLTextAreaElement>, 'name'> {
+  /** The form control from react-hook-form */
  control?: Control<TFieldValues>;
+  /** The name of the field */
  name: TName;
+  /** Optional label text */
  label?: string;
+  /** Optional description text */
  description?: string;
+  /** Optional custom components for form elements */
  components?: Partial<FieldComponents>;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f91553 and 7c60047.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-checkbox.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-switch.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/components/src/remix/remix-checkbox.tsx (1)

1-1: LGTM!

Clean import of useMemo from React.

packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx (2)

1-21: Well-structured component with proper type safety.

The component demonstrates good practices:

  • Clean separation of concerns
  • Proper type safety using Omit utility
  • Correct integration with remix-hook-form
  • Consistent with the broader form component architecture

11-19: Consider measuring the performance impact of memoization.

The memoization of form components is consistent with other Remix form components and prevents unnecessary recreations. However, since these are just component references, the performance benefit might be minimal.

Let's check if similar memoization patterns exist in other Remix components:

✅ Verification successful

Memoization pattern is consistent across Remix form components

The useMemo implementation for form components is consistently applied across all Remix form components (TextField, Textarea, Checkbox, and Switch). This pattern is part of a deliberate architectural decision for form component implementations, not an isolated optimization. The consistent usage across the codebase validates this approach.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar useMemo patterns in other Remix form components
# Expected: Find similar patterns to confirm consistency

rg -A 5 "useMemo.*FormControl.*FormLabel.*FormDescription.*FormMessage" packages/components/src/remix/

Length of output: 104


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for individual useMemo patterns in Remix components
# to get a better understanding of the memoization patterns

# Search for useMemo in remix components
rg "useMemo\(" packages/components/src/remix/ -B 1 -A 3

# Also search for component definitions to understand the context
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useMemo(() => ({
  $$$
}), $_)'

Length of output: 4323

packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx (2)

1-6: LGTM! Clean imports and type definition

The change from interface to type alias is appropriate for this use case, and the imports are well-organized.


21-21: Verify component usage patterns

Let's verify how this component is being used across the codebase to ensure consistent implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Component usage appears consistent with Remix form patterns

The verification shows that:

  • RemixTextarea is used in storybook documentation with proper form integration
  • Direct Textarea usages are only found in the base component and the Remix wrapper itself
  • No instances of improper Textarea usage that should be using RemixTextarea instead
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RemixTextarea usage patterns
echo "Searching for RemixTextarea usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "<RemixTextarea"

# Check if there are any direct Textarea usages that should be using RemixTextarea instead
echo "Checking for potential missed Remix integration opportunities..."
rg -A 3 "<Textarea" | grep -v "RemixTextarea"

Length of output: 1282

packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (3)

23-39: Well-structured form field implementation with proper error handling

The component now properly handles form validation errors and displays them using FormMessage, while maintaining a clean structure with label, description, and error message placement.


46-46: LGTM: Proper display name setup

The display name is correctly set, which helps with debugging in React DevTools.


25-38: Verify consistent component customization pattern

The component uses a flexible customization pattern with the components prop. Let's verify this pattern is used consistently across other form components.

✅ Verification successful

Component customization pattern is consistently implemented

The search results confirm that the component customization pattern using the components prop is consistently implemented across all form-related components in the codebase:

  • FormLabel customization is used in 7 components
  • FormControl customization is used in 7 components
  • FormDescription customization is used in 8 components
  • FormMessage customization is used in 7 components

All form components follow the same pattern of allowing customization through the components prop with optional chaining, maintaining a consistent API across the form component library.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar component customization patterns in form components
echo "Searching for FormLabel component customization..."
rg "FormLabel Component={components\?.FormLabel}" --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormControl component customization..."
rg "FormControl Component={components\?.FormControl}" --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormDescription component customization..."
rg "FormDescription Component={components\?.FormDescription}" --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormMessage component customization..."
rg "FormMessage Component={components\?.FormMessage}" --type tsx

Length of output: 1357


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar component customization patterns in form components with escaped special characters
echo "Searching for FormLabel component customization..."
rg "FormLabel Component=\{components\?\." --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormControl component customization..."
rg "FormControl Component=\{components\?\." --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormDescription component customization..."
rg "FormDescription Component=\{components\?\." --type tsx

echo "Searching for FormMessage component customization..."
rg "FormMessage Component=\{components\?\." --type tsx

Length of output: 805


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar component customization patterns in form components
echo "Searching for FormLabel component customization..."
rg "FormLabel Component=\{components\?\." 

echo "Searching for FormControl component customization..."
rg "FormControl Component=\{components\?\."

echo "Searching for FormDescription component customization..."
rg "FormDescription Component=\{components\?\."

echo "Searching for FormMessage component customization..."
rg "FormMessage Component=\{components\?\."

# Also search for files that might contain form components
echo -e "\nSearching for form-related files..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "form" -t f

Length of output: 4867

Comment on lines 11 to 19
const components = useMemo(
() => ({
FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
FormControl: RemixFormControl,
FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
}),
[]
);
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Consider removing unnecessary memoization across all Remix form components

The pattern of memoizing static component references is consistently used across multiple Remix form components:

  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-checkbox.tsx
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-switch.tsx
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-textarea.tsx
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx

All these components use identical memoization for static component references, which adds unnecessary overhead without providing performance benefits. Consider removing useMemo and using direct object assignment in all these files.

🔗 Analysis chain

Consider removing unnecessary memoization

While memoization is generally good for performance, in this specific case, it might be unnecessary overhead since:

  1. The components object only contains static component references that never change
  2. The overhead of creating this simple object is minimal
  3. The useMemo hook itself adds a small memory overhead

Consider simplifying to:

-  const components = useMemo(
-    () => ({
-      FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
-      FormControl: RemixFormControl,
-      FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
-      FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
-    }),
-    []
-  );
+  const components = {
+    FormDescription: RemixFormDescription,
+    FormControl: RemixFormControl,
+    FormLabel: RemixFormLabel,
+    FormMessage: RemixFormMessage,
+  };

Let's verify if this pattern is consistently used across other similar components:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Remix components use similar memoization pattern
# This will help understand if this is part of a broader optimization strategy

# Search for similar useMemo patterns in Remix components
ast-grep --pattern 'const components = useMemo(() => ({$$$}), []);' packages/components/src/remix/

Length of output: 2832

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yikes, this is opposite advice of what you gave earlier. I'll remove these, because I don't like the useMemo approach if not necessary.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaruesink, I apologize for the conflicting advice earlier. You're correct; if the useMemo approach isn't necessary, removing it is the right decision.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: jaruesink
PR: lambda-curry/forms#14
File: packages/components/src/remix/remix-checkbox.tsx:11-19
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T05:25:46.556Z
Learning: Ensure consistency when advising on the use of `useMemo` for static component references in Remix form components, avoiding unnecessary memoization where it doesn't provide performance benefits.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

Comment on lines +32 to +34
{...field}
{...props}
ref={field.ref}
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider handling multiple refs properly

The current implementation might override external refs when spreading props before the field.ref assignment.

Consider using a ref merging utility to handle both external refs and form refs:

+import { useMergeRefs } from '@hooks/use-merge-refs';

// Inside the render function
+const mergedRef = useMergeRefs([ref, field.ref]);

<textarea
  className={cn(
    'flex min-h-[80px] w-full rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-base ring-offset-background placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50 md:text-sm',
    className,
  )}
  {...field}
  {...props}
-  ref={field.ref}
+  ref={mergedRef}
/>

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's okay to have the parent ref go to the parent field item and keep this ref the field.ref

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaruesink, understood. We'll keep the current implementation as is.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: jaruesink
PR: lambda-curry/forms#14
File: packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx:32-34
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T05:29:38.992Z
Learning: In the `Textarea` component (`packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx`), it's acceptable to assign `field.ref` directly to the `ref` of the textarea element without merging it with external refs.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

@jaruesink jaruesink changed the title chore: adding a remix text area story chore: adding a remix text area story & fix: #7 Custom attribute getting added to inputs unnecessarily Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
packages/components/src/ui/text-field.tsx (1)

25-46: Well-structured component implementation

The component demonstrates good architectural practices:

  • Proper integration with react-hook-form
  • Flexible component composition through the components prop
  • Comprehensive error handling with fieldState
  • Type-safe implementation with generics

Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior with both controlled and uncontrolled usage patterns.

packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (2)

6-15: Consider adding JSDoc documentation

The interface is well-typed and provides excellent type safety for form integration. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain the generic parameters and props for better developer experience.

Example documentation:

/**
 * Props for the Textarea component.
 * @template TFieldValues - The type of the form values
 * @template TName - The type of the field name
 */
export interface TextareaProps<
  TFieldValues extends FieldValues = FieldValues,
  TName extends FieldPath<TFieldValues> = FieldPath<TFieldValues>
> {
  /** The form control from react-hook-form */
  control?: Control<TFieldValues>;
  /** The name of the field in the form */
  name: TName;
  /** Optional label text */
  label?: string;
  /** Optional description text */
  description?: string;
  /** Optional component overrides */
  components?: Partial<FieldComponents>;
}

32-34: Consider props spreading order

The current order of spreading props might allow overriding of important field properties. Consider reversing the order to ensure field properties take precedence.

-{...field}
-{...props}
-ref={field.ref}
+{...props}
+{...field}
+ref={useMergeRefs([ref, field.ref])}
packages/components/src/ui/switch.tsx (1)

26-26: Review ref handling changes

The ref handling has been restructured:

  1. The main ref is now attached to the FormItem wrapper
  2. The Switch primitive now uses field.ref from react-hook-form

This change improves form integration but introduces a potential gotcha:

  • The ref now points to the wrapper div instead of the switch input
  • This might affect accessibility tools or custom logic expecting the ref to point to the input element

Consider documenting this behavior change in the component's documentation or adding a second ref prop specifically for the switch input if needed.

Also applies to: 33-33

packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx (2)

40-40: Consider ref handling implications

Moving the ref to FormItem wraps the entire form control group, which is good for form layouts but might affect direct DOM manipulation needs. Ensure this aligns with your use cases.

Consider documenting this ref behavior in component documentation to help consumers understand what element they're referencing.


Line range hint 50-57: Improved form integration with field.ref

The Button now correctly uses field.ref from react-hook-form, which is the recommended approach for form library integration. This ensures proper form state management and validation handling.

Consider adding aria-invalid and aria-describedby attributes for better accessibility:

 <Button
   ref={field.ref}
   variant="outline"
+  aria-invalid={!!fieldState.error}
+  aria-describedby={fieldState.error ? `${name}-error` : undefined}
   className={cn(
     'w-[280px] justify-start text-left font-normal',
     !field.value && 'text-muted-foreground',
     buttonClassName,
   )}
 >
packages/components/src/remix/remix-form.tsx (2)

43-57: Consider enhancing error message handling

The implementation looks good with proper ref forwarding and accessibility attributes. However, consider adding error message logging or telemetry for better debugging in production.

 export const RemixFormControl = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof FormControl>>(
   (props, ref) => {
     const { error, formItemId, formDescriptionId, formMessageId } = useRemixFormField();
+    // Consider adding error logging/telemetry here
+    if (error) {
+      console.error('Form control error:', { fieldId: formItemId, error });
+    }
     return (
       <FormControl
         ref={ref}

68-73: Enhance error handling and accessibility

While the implementation is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Add null checks for error message
  2. Include aria-invalid attribute for better accessibility
 export const RemixFormMessage = forwardRef<HTMLParagraphElement, ComponentPropsWithoutRef<typeof FormMessage>>(
   (props, ref) => {
     const { error, formMessageId } = useRemixFormField();
-    return <FormMessage ref={ref} formMessageId={formMessageId} error={error?.message} {...props} />;
+    const errorMessage = error?.message ?? null;
+    return (
+      <FormMessage
+        ref={ref}
+        formMessageId={formMessageId}
+        error={errorMessage}
+        aria-invalid={!!errorMessage}
+        {...props}
+      />
+    );
   },
 );
packages/components/src/ui/checkbox.tsx (1)

35-38: LGTM: Improved form integration

The ref handling changes correctly integrate with react-hook-form by:

  1. Using field.ref for form state management
  2. Forwarding the outer ref to FormItem for layout/accessibility

Consider adding a comment explaining this ref handling strategy:

 <FormItem className={cn('flex flex-row items-start space-x-3 space-y-0', className)} ref={ref}>
   <FormControl Component={components?.FormControl}>
     <CheckboxPrimitive.Root
+      // Using field.ref for react-hook-form integration
       ref={field.ref}
packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (1)

70-70: Consider enhancing error message accessibility

The conditional error message rendering is a good improvement. However, consider adding an aria-live region to ensure screen readers announce when error messages appear.

- {fieldState.error && <FormMessage Component={components?.FormMessage}>{fieldState.error.message}</FormMessage>}
+ {fieldState.error && (
+   <div aria-live="polite">
+     <FormMessage Component={components?.FormMessage}>{fieldState.error.message}</FormMessage>
+   </div>
+ )}
packages/components/src/ui/input-otp.tsx (2)

105-105: Well-structured ref handling for form integration

Good use of field.ref for form control integration while maintaining separation of concerns between form control refs and component container refs. This architecture allows for better form state management through react-hook-form while keeping the component container independently referenceable.


Line range hint 114-124: Consider making slot rendering more dynamic

The current implementation handles 8 slots specifically, but could be more flexible by dynamically rendering slots based on maxLength.

Consider refactoring to use Array.from for dynamic slot rendering:

-                <InputOTPGroup>
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={0} />
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={1} />
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={2} />
-                  {isEightSlots && <InputOTPSlot index={3} />}
-                </InputOTPGroup>
-                <InputOTPSeparator />
-                <InputOTPGroup>
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={isEightSlots ? 4 : 3} />
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={isEightSlots ? 5 : 4} />
-                  <InputOTPSlot index={isEightSlots ? 6 : 5} />
-                  {isEightSlots && <InputOTPSlot index={7} />}
-                </InputOTPGroup>
+                {Array.from({ length: Math.ceil(maxLength/4) }).map((_, groupIndex) => (
+                  <>
+                    {groupIndex > 0 && <InputOTPSeparator />}
+                    <InputOTPGroup>
+                      {Array.from({ length: Math.min(4, maxLength - groupIndex * 4) }).map((_, slotIndex) => (
+                        <InputOTPSlot key={groupIndex * 4 + slotIndex} index={groupIndex * 4 + slotIndex} />
+                      ))}
+                    </InputOTPGroup>
+                  </>
+                ))}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c60047 and 6c3ec06.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/remix/remix-form.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/checkbox.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx (4 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/input-otp.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/input.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/switch.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/text-field.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/components/src/ui/input.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (19)
.vscode/settings.json (3)

2-2: LGTM: Spell checker words are appropriate

The spell checker words list includes relevant technical terms and tool names used in the project.


10-13: LGTM: Safe code actions configuration

The code actions are properly configured with "explicit" mode, requiring user confirmation before applying changes. This is a safe default that prevents unwanted automatic modifications while still providing the convenience of Biome's formatting and import organization features.


3-9: Verify Biome formatter configuration and potential conflicts

The configuration sets Biome as the default formatter. Please ensure:

  1. Biome is installed as a VS Code extension
  2. There are no conflicts with other formatters (e.g., Prettier) or ESLint configurations
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to check for any potential conflicts in the configuration files.


Biome formatter configuration is correctly set up without conflicts

The configuration is valid as:

  • Only Biome (@biomejs/biome v1.9.1) is installed as a formatting dependency
  • No conflicting Prettier or ESLint configurations exist
  • A biome.json configuration file is present
  • No other VS Code formatter settings exist for JavaScript/TypeScript files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential formatter conflicts

# Check for Prettier config
echo "Checking for Prettier config files..."
fd -t f "^\.prettier" -t f "prettier\.config\."

# Check for ESLint config
echo "Checking for ESLint config files..."
fd -t f "^\.eslint" -t f "eslint\.config\."

# Check package.json for formatting-related dependencies
echo "Checking package.json for formatter dependencies..."
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    jq '.dependencies + .devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | test("prettier|eslint|biome")))' package.json
fi

Length of output: 757


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other formatter or linter configurations
echo "Checking for any config files..."
fd -e json -e js -e cjs -e yaml -e yml | grep -iE '(prettier|eslint|biome|format)'

# Check if there are any other VS Code settings that might conflict
echo "Checking VS Code settings..."
if [ -f ".vscode/settings.json" ]; then
    jq '.[".js"]?, .[".jsx"]?, .[".ts"]?, .[".tsx"]?, .["javascript"]?, .["javascriptreact"]?' .vscode/settings.json
fi

# Check for biome configuration
echo "Checking for Biome config..."
fd "biome.json"

Length of output: 511

packages/components/src/ui/text-field.tsx (1)

25-25: Verify the impact of ref type change

The component's ref type has been changed from HTMLInputElement to HTMLDivElement, and the ref handling has been restructured:

  • The main ref now points to the FormItem wrapper
  • The input element uses field.ref

This change might affect existing code that expects an input ref.

Also applies to: 35-35, 38-38

✅ Verification successful

No impact found from TextField ref type change

Based on the codebase analysis, there are no direct usages of TextField's ref found in the codebase. The component is primarily used through the RemixTextField wrapper, which doesn't utilize the ref prop. The change from HTMLInputElement to HTMLDivElement appears to be safe to implement.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextField ref usage in the codebase
rg -A 3 "TextField.*ref" --type tsx --type ts

Length of output: 75


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextField ref usage in the codebase with ripgrep
rg -A 3 "TextField.*ref" --type typescript

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextField component usage with useRef
rg -A 3 "useRef.*TextField" --type typescript

Length of output: 82


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript/TSX files that import TextField
rg "import.*TextField.*from.*components" --type typescript

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript/TSX files in the repository
fd "\.(tsx|ts)$" -x rg -l "TextField"

Length of output: 185


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of files that use TextField for ref usage
cat "./apps/docs/src/remix/remix-text-field.stories.tsx" "./packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx"

Length of output: 5773


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for useRef or ref patterns in files containing TextField
rg "useRef|ref=" "./apps/docs/src/remix/remix-text-field.stories.tsx" "./packages/components/src/remix/remix-text-field.tsx"

Length of output: 122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextField usage in the entire codebase with grep
rg -A 5 "<TextField" .

# Also search for any direct ref usage with TextField
rg -A 5 "TextField.*ref|ref.*TextField" .

Length of output: 779

packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx (2)

1-4: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and necessary

The imports are logically structured and all are being utilized in the implementation.


46-46: LGTM: Display name properly set

Setting the display name is good practice for debugging purposes.

packages/components/src/ui/switch.tsx (3)

Line range hint 33-40: Validate form control integration

The Switch primitive's integration with react-hook-form looks correct:

  • Uses field.ref for DOM reference
  • Properly binds checked state to field.value
  • Handles changes via field.onChange

Line range hint 41-46: LGTM: Styling implementation

The styling implementation using cn utility and Radix's data attributes is well-structured and follows best practices for handling component states.


20-22: Verify the ref type change impact

The component's ref type has been changed from ElementRef<typeof SwitchPrimitives.Root> to HTMLDivElement. While this aligns with moving the ref to the FormItem wrapper, we should verify this doesn't break existing ref usage.

✅ Verification successful

Ref type change is safe to proceed

The search results show that the Switch component is not being used with refs in any consumer code. The only ref usage is internal within the component itself, where it's properly handled by passing field.ref to the SwitchPrimitives.Root. The change from ElementRef<typeof SwitchPrimitives.Root> to HTMLDivElement is safe as it matches the new structure where the ref is forwarded to the FormItem wrapper (which is a div).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Switch component usage with ref
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useRef<$_>();
$$$
<Switch ref={$_} $$$'

# Also search for direct ref assignments
rg -A 2 'ref={.*}.*<Switch'

Length of output: 207


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Switch component usage with ref, fixing the regex
rg -U '<Switch.*ref=' -A 2

# Search for useRef declarations followed by Switch usage within a reasonable context
rg -U 'useRef.*\n.*(?s:.)*?<Switch' --multiline

# Search for any Switch component usage to understand the context
rg -U '<Switch' -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 1271

packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx (1)

33-33: Verify accessibility implications of ref type change

Changing the ref from HTMLButtonElement to HTMLDivElement might affect focus management and keyboard navigation, as the primary interactive element (Button) no longer receives the forwarded ref.

✅ Verification successful

Ref forwarding implementation is correct and maintains accessibility

The implementation correctly handles focus management and keyboard navigation:

  • The Button component receives the form field's ref (field.ref) from react-hook-form, ensuring proper form control functionality
  • The outer FormItem receives the forwarded ref, which is appropriate as it's the container component
  • The button remains the primary interactive element with its own ref handling through react-hook-form's field control

The ref type change from HTMLButtonElement to HTMLDivElement is justified because:

  • The DatePicker's root component is now FormItem (a div-based container)
  • The Button component maintains its own ref through react-hook-form's field.ref
  • This pattern follows react-hook-form's best practices for form control integration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar date picker implementations to verify ref handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, $props>($$$)' 

Length of output: 62


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the complete DatePicker implementation to understand the ref usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export const DatePicker = forwardRef<$type, $props>($$$)'

# Also search for FormItem usage within DatePicker to understand ref forwarding
rg "FormItem" "packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx" -A 5 -B 5

# Search for Button usage to verify ref handling
rg "Button" "packages/components/src/ui/date-picker.tsx" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 2421

packages/components/src/remix/remix-form.tsx (2)

1-5: LGTM! Well-organized imports

The imports are properly structured with explicit type imports, enhancing type safety and code clarity.


60-65: LGTM! Clean implementation

The RemixFormDescription component is well-implemented with proper ref forwarding and type safety.

packages/components/src/ui/checkbox.tsx (2)

1-1: LGTM: Correct import for forwardRef

The removal of the type keyword from the forwardRef import is correct since forwardRef is needed at runtime.


29-29: Verify ref type change implications

The ref type change from ElementRef<typeof CheckboxPrimitive.Root> to HTMLDivElement means consumers can no longer access checkbox-specific methods through refs. Ensure this aligns with the intended usage pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Ref type change is safe to proceed

The ref type change from ElementRef<typeof CheckboxPrimitive.Root> to HTMLDivElement is justified and safe. The search results show that:

  1. There are no external usages of Checkbox refs in the codebase
  2. The only ref usages are internal to the component itself:
    • One for forwarding to FormItem (which is a div, matching the new type)
    • One for form field integration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any direct ref usage of this component that might be affected
rg -l "useRef.*<.*Checkbox" 
rg "ref=.*{.*}" --type tsx -A 2 -B 2 | grep -B 2 -A 2 "Checkbox"

Length of output: 194


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any direct ref usage of this component that might be affected
rg "useRef.*Checkbox"

# Search for ref prop usage with Checkbox component
rg "ref.*=.*" --type tsx -A 2 -B 2 | rg -B 2 -A 2 "<Checkbox"

# Look for Checkbox component usage patterns
rg "<Checkbox" --type tsx -A 2 -B 2

# Check if there are any stories or tests using refs with Checkbox
fd "checkbox" -e stories.tsx -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx --exec rg "useRef|ref=" {}

Length of output: 263


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any direct ref usage of this component that might be affected
rg "useRef.*Checkbox"

# Search for ref prop usage with Checkbox component
rg -t ts -t tsx "ref.*=.*" -A 2 -B 2 | rg -B 2 -A 2 "<Checkbox"

# Look for Checkbox component usage patterns
rg -t ts -t tsx "<Checkbox" -A 2 -B 2

# Check if there are any stories or tests using refs with Checkbox
fd -e ts -e tsx -g "*checkbox*" | xargs rg "useRef|ref="

Length of output: 458

packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx (3)

57-57: LGTM: Improved type safety with more specific ref type

The change from ElementRef<typeof RadioGroup> to HTMLDivElement better reflects the actual DOM structure since the ref is applied to the wrapping FormItem div element.


63-63: LGTM: Enhanced error handling with fieldState

Adding fieldState to the render function enables proper form validation state handling, following react-hook-form best practices.


67-67: LGTM: Proper form integration with field.ref

Using field.ref instead of the direct ref ensures proper integration with react-hook-form's field registration system.

packages/components/src/ui/input-otp.tsx (2)

97-97: LGTM: Proper ref handling for form container

The ref is correctly passed to FormItem, following form component best practices by allowing the entire form field container to be referenced.


85-85: Verify consistency of ref type changes across form components

The change from ElementRef<typeof OTPInput> to HTMLDivElement for the forwarded ref is a breaking change that could affect existing code relying on the OTPInput ref.

Let's verify if this change is consistent with other form field components:

✅ Verification successful

The previous pattern might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to understand the ref type patterns across form components and identify relevant form field components for analysis.


Let's examine the ref types in other form components and their FormItem usage to understand if this is a consistent pattern.


Change to HTMLDivElement ref type is consistent with form component patterns

The change from ElementRef<typeof OTPInput> to HTMLDivElement for the forwarded ref is consistent with the form component patterns in the codebase:

  • TextField uses forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, TextFieldProps>
  • FormItem uses forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, FormItemProps>
  • All form field components (TextField, Checkbox, RadioGroup) consistently:
    • Use FormItem as their outer wrapper
    • Forward their ref to FormItem
    • Use HTMLDivElement as their ref type
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar form field components to verify ref type consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $FIELD = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, $Props>'

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader pattern to find form field components using forwardRef
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = forwardRef<$TYPE, $_>('

# Also search for specific form field components
rg -l "FormField|InputField|TextField|SelectField|CheckboxField|RadioField" --type ts

Length of output: 671


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the ref types in these specific form-related components
echo "=== text-field.tsx ==="
cat packages/components/src/ui/text-field.tsx | grep -A 1 "export const.*forwardRef"

echo -e "\n=== form.tsx ==="
cat packages/components/src/ui/form.tsx | grep -A 1 "export const.*forwardRef"

echo -e "\n=== checkbox.tsx ==="
cat packages/components/src/ui/checkbox.tsx | grep -A 1 "export const.*forwardRef"

echo -e "\n=== radio-group.tsx ==="
cat packages/components/src/ui/radio-group.tsx | grep -A 1 "export const.*forwardRef"

# Also check FormItem usage in these components
echo -e "\n=== FormItem usage ==="
rg "FormItem" packages/components/src/ui/{text-field,form,checkbox,radio-group}.tsx

Length of output: 3265

Comment on lines 32 to 33
console.log('field', field);
console.log('props', props);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove console.log statements

These debugging statements should be removed before merging to production.

- console.log('field', field);
- console.log('props', props);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.log('field', field);
console.log('props', props);

Comment on lines +17 to +24
export const Textarea = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, TextareaProps>(
({ control, name, label, description, className, components, ...props }, ref) => {
return (
<FormField
control={control}
name={name}
render={({ field, fieldState }) => (
<FormItem className={className} ref={ref}>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Review ref forwarding implementation

The current ref implementation has two potential issues:

  1. The ref is forwarded to FormItem instead of the textarea element
  2. There might be conflicts between the forwarded ref and field.ref

Consider this implementation:

-export const Textarea = forwardRef<HTMLDivElement, TextareaProps>(
+export const Textarea = forwardRef<HTMLTextAreaElement, TextareaProps>(
   ({ control, name, label, description, className, components, ...props }, ref) => {
     return (
       <FormField
         control={control}
         name={name}
         render={({ field, fieldState }) => (
-          <FormItem className={className} ref={ref}>
+          <FormItem className={className}>

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the textarea gets field.ref so we should be good

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jaruesink, understood. Since the textarea element receives field.ref, and the ref forwarding is handled appropriately, we should be good. Thanks for the clarification.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: jaruesink
PR: lambda-curry/forms#14
File: packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx:17-24
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T05:28:58.646Z
Learning: In `packages/components/src/ui/textarea.tsx`, the `Textarea` component forwards its ref to `FormItem`, and the textarea element receives `field.ref`, so the ref forwarding works correctly.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

@Bfunk54 Bfunk54 changed the title chore: adding a remix text area story & fix: #7 Custom attribute getting added to inputs unnecessarily [LC-118] chore: adding a remix text area story & fix: #7 Custom attribute getting added to inputs unnecessarily Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.changeset/heavy-dragons-drop.md (1)

6-6: Enhance the change description

The description could be more comprehensive and properly formatted:

-Added remix textarea story and fixes a react error
+Added Remix textarea story and fixed a React error. Also resolved issue #7 regarding unnecessary custom attributes on inputs.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~6-~6: “React” is a proper noun and needs to be capitalized.
Context: ... Added remix textarea story and fixes a react error

(A_GOOGLE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 610d009 and 19b0854.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/heavy-dragons-drop.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.changeset/heavy-dragons-drop.md

[grammar] ~6-~6: “React” is a proper noun and needs to be capitalized.
Context: ... Added remix textarea story and fixes a react error

(A_GOOGLE)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.changeset/heavy-dragons-drop.md (1)

1-4: LGTM: Version bumps are appropriate

The minor version increments for both packages are appropriate given the new feature (Remix textarea story) and bug fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

@Bfunk54 Bfunk54 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Custom attribute getting added to inputs unnecessarily

3 participants